Identifications and useless wars

For example and first of all, an ordinary person is identified with their gender, which unconsciously becomes a marker of species. This fallacy cascades into social relationships between men and women, leading to war within gender ideology, and growing aberrations in sexual behavior.

An individual identified with his or her gender will in fact experience numerous discomforts and disagreements, especially on an emotional and physical level, more influenced by the ancestral functions penalized by one’s incorrect relational behaviour. A woman identified in the gender "woman" will unconsciously experience the sensation that only other "women" are of her kind, therefore her psychology will adapt to this belief by altering her perception of reality, producing impulses, emotions and thoughts consistent with this belief .

The same goes for a "man" or a "transexual"... if an individual is identified simultaneously with the "man" gender and simultaneously with the "progressive" gender and simultaneously with the "father" gender, he will experience numerous cognitive dissonances , which, in order to be remedied, will oblige him to consciously retreat in pitiful compromises, or to abandon some "ideological herds". For example, a Real Madrid fan could abandon all interest in the team when accepting an important job ("now I’m an entrepreneur"...), perhaps because in the new pack they consider football silly, or because our colleague we like supports Valencia.

Let us not forget that the sexual function, despite the daily messes, remains an atavistic function that must be satisfied without fail, and its correct satisfaction can only take place between individuals of the same species.